Our 370 km/s motion read from the CMB dipole must reappear in distant source counts, and it does not: 1.36 million WISE quasars show a dipole two to five times too large, rejecting the kinematic expectation at 4.9σ, with radio counts concurring. Either the velocity is wrong, the sources are anisotropic at gigaparsec scale, or part of the CMB dipole is not motion, and every branch breaks something foundational, because FLRW requires matter and radiation to share one standard of rest.
The model assumes the CMB dipole is purely kinematic, one boost, fully shared by every distant population. There is no mechanism for an intrinsic dipole in either radiation or counts, so a measured mismatch between the two frames is unprocessable: the cosmological principle itself is what fails the test.
SCT predicted the mismatch's structure before the catalogs measured it: the CMB dipole is composite. One component is genuine motion, but a second is built in at deposition, the residual frame velocity our pocket inherited from the collision geometry, v_frame set by the impact parameter (P63), plus the dipolar Λ_eff variation across the local volume that environmental expansion produces (P17, the registered dipole-modulation prediction). Source counts respond to the kinematic component but not identically to the inherited and Λ_eff components, so the counts dipole and the CMB dipole must disagree, in direction roughly aligned, in amplitude mismatched, exactly the configuration Secrest measures. The excess is the non-kinematic remainder made visible by the one test able to separate the pieces.
The geometry then locks to the anomaly family: the frame velocity is parallel to the impact parameter and therefore perpendicular to the inherited J axis (P64), tying the dipole's direction to the quadrupole-octupole alignments and the connected-multipole statistics through the registered cross-check. The premise foundations are in Paper 1, From Chaos to Convergent Foundations (P57, P63, P64), with the dipolar modulation prediction carried in Paper 10, From Chaos To Confirming Falsifiability.
Two premises split one vector, and a 4.9σ foundational crisis becomes bookkeeping: the universe has one rest frame, but our patch carries inheritance the pure-motion reading ignores.
The decomposition is testable: deeper catalogs (Rubin, Euclid, SKA) finding the counts dipole converging to the full CMB-kinematic expectation, the excess dissolving into systematics, would remove the non-kinematic component and restore the pure-motion reading, falsifying the composite-dipole account. The registered geometric kill stands with it: the dipole found aligned with, rather than perpendicular to, the large-scale J axis at 3σ breaks the inheritance geometry.