|
 |
 |
|
I wish to post this disclaimer regarding "On The Natural State Of Nature". In certain images, I purported that there was empirical evidence of what happens when you try to squash a single meson into the space that a single quark normally occupies. I predict it would produce two mesons, and may have inadvertently implied that we had experimental evidence. The more truthful statement would be that to date, we have not yet been able to successfully isolate a single quark or separate a meson into two quarks. When you bring Lattice-QCD into the field equations of general relativity, we see that quark degeneracy pressure can produce a range of equations of state able to support a finite-density polyquark. There is a point where the strength of confined LQCD bonds prevents any further gravitational collapse, thus preventing a singularity in place of a densely packed quark soup.
My preprint paper on this topic : “An End to Black Hole Singularities” Polyquark Cores and Quark Degeneracy Pressure, A Lattice-QCD-Based Equation of State for Finite-Density Black Hole Interiors and he Stabilization of Gravitational Collapse can be found here : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18092309 Another disclaimer is that in my image, I wanted to show the .08 cosmic size limit beyond which the strong nuclear force takes over. My placement in the formula image was done partially to create distance between the three changes, but honestly, the limit might just be on the equal sign itself, where the combined aggregated effects of gravitational waves in phase would not impact spacetime below that size limit. The newest images show the last of three fixes to the field equations of general relativity, which introduces a new operator signifying the smallest distance at which the field equations have bearing. There is no such thing in the physical realm as an actual singularity. They exist in formula and equation only! You can NOT place within a finite bounded region of spacetime an infinite amount of relative mass or an infinite amount of relative energy or an infinite amount of relative time or an infinite amount of relative space. However, infinite amounts that are not relative to us likely exist within every region of any size, and are a natural side effect of accepting eternal time and infinite space... One other disclaimer I feel I should mention is as it relates to modifying the field equations of general relativity to account for dark matter. Since there is evidence pointing towards the attractive force of gravity using some type of wave to send its instructions through spacetime to different points of spacetime, telling each one where, and how much, and when to bend and warp, there was mention in multiple areas where the constructive interference of waves in phase will increase in amplitude and energy. In more than one spot, I mentioned the amplitude would not increase linearly, but exponentially, and upon further reflection, that statement is not true. The increase in amplitude is a linear increase, but the energy density (intensity) carried by the wave due to that increase in amplitude will increase exponentially. If that energy density (stress energy momentum tensor instructions) is what determines the depth and breadth of a gravity well, then we do not need particles to explain dark matter if we can better understand how constructive interference of gravitational waves of attraction impacts our cosmos. Another area tied to this that I feel is often overlooked is the electromagnetic properties of spacetime and how the permeability and permittivity of free space are impacted by different densities in the ionized plasma that is everywhere, including between galaxies. Magnets work when atoms align in polarity. When you have a disc or plane of star systems where the majority of star systems orient their direction of rotation similarly, the chance that similarly aligned magnetic and electric fields that like gravity, are scale independent and scale invariant, can extend their reaches further than each one could do by itself, are another area where dark matter related to galactic rotations may be found. If there was no hot dense center origin that started our big bang process, and cosmic filaments are the leftover streams of hot swirling plasma left over from superluminal collisions, then we do not need dark matter to account for the structure of our cosmic web, and so explaining increased gravitational lensing and increased galactic rates of rotations could both be due to aggregations of electromagnetic properties that are not easy to see individually? Mond is just one attempt to explain dark matter without using particles, but two other methods that could both be at play, working together or independently to cause the effects we see with increased lensing and increased rotational speeds. The impact of constructive interference of waves of gravitational attraction, causing higher intensity waves of attraction that can constructively interfere at separate scale factors due to separate nested comoving structures in tandem with (or solely due to) similar aggregations of polarized magnetic fields and/or electric fields, could explain the effects we label dark matter. Over the next fifty years, as we can better gauge the impacts that our solar system, the only thing we can reliably approximate the mass of, I predict we may begin to be able to trace movements of galactic neighbors that should be impacted in ways that do not back the total mass we approximate, but instead the aggregated impact of waves of attraction that emanate out spherically from approximated mass. |
LIVE LONG AND PROSPER
MAY THE FORCE BE WITH YOU
42
DR JM NIPOK